Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing academic publishing, particularly the peer review process. Traditionally, peer review ensures the validity and quality of research before publication, but it can be slow and prone to human bias. AI offers solutions to these challenges, enhancing the efficiency, fairness, and rigor of the review process.
One significant way AI can contribute to peer review is through automated manuscript screening. AI algorithms can quickly evaluate submissions for adherence to journal guidelines, plagiarism, and ethical compliance. This initial screening reduces the workload for human reviewers and ensures that only manuscripts meeting basic standards proceed to in-depth review.
AI can also improve the matching of manuscripts to appropriate reviewers. Selecting reviewers with the right expertise is crucial but can be time-consuming and subjective. AI can analyze a vast database of researchers, considering their publication history and areas of expertise to recommend the most suitable reviewers. This precision matching improves review quality and expedites the process.
Despite its potential, integrating AI in peer review raises ethical and practical questions. Organizations like the European Research Area Forum of the European Commission have published guidelines on the use of AI in academia, explicitly advising against using AI for peer reviews. Specifically, these guidelines recommend that AI tools not be used in sensitive activities such as peer review, in order to respect privacy and intellectual property rights and promote transparency. Researchers, publishers, and technologists must develop ethical guidelines and best practices for using AI in peer review. As AI technology evolves, it will play an increasingly vital role in shaping the future of academic publishing, provided human oversight is maintained.
Click here for the Japanese version.