In May 2025, a controversial U.S. executive order sparked alarm among scientists by placing political appointees in charge of vetting federal research grants and allowing them to “correct” scientific information. This directive, titled “Restoring Gold Standard Science,” aims to align research with the administration’s priorities, emphasizing reproducibility and transparency. However, critics argue it undermines the merit-based peer review process, a cornerstone of scientific integrity, by prioritizing political alignment over expertise. Over 6,000 scientists signed an open letter, warning that such oversight could suppress dissenting viewpoints and stifle innovation.
The order’s impact is already disrupting research. Agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF) have paused grant reviews, leaving researchers uncertain about funding. The directive allows appointees to terminate grants “for convenience,” bypassing traditional “for cause” standards, which could halt projects on climate change, diversity, or other politically sensitive topics. This shift risks delaying critical research, reducing U.S. scientific output, and eroding public trust in science, as political influence may overshadow evidence-based decision-making.
Globally, this development raises concerns about the politicization of science. Countries with strong research traditions, like Germany and Canada, rely on independent peer review to maintain credibility. The U.S. move could embolden authoritarian regimes to further control scientific inquiry, as seen historically in state-sponsored pseudoscience. This trend threatens global collaboration, as international partners may hesitate to work with U.S. institutions under political scrutiny.
While the executive order claims to enhance scientific rigor, it risks undermining the autonomy that drives innovation. The global scientific community must advocate for independent, evidence-based research to preserve trust and progress. Scientists worldwide should monitor these developments, as they could reshape the landscape of international research collaboration.
Click here for the Japanese version.